Poster can be found in location 142.

Introduction: Person-centered care (PCC) is a globally recognized approach to healthcare that prioritizes the needs and values of the person receiving care while also considering the structure of the healthcare interaction. However, the systematic implementation of PCC in practice remains limited. Aim: A scoping review was undertaken to map the current knowledge of instruments used to evaluate PCC from a healthcare staff perspective. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines and the framework by Arksey and O'Malley, a comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. In addition, two grey literature databases were explored. The inclusion criteria were: 1) measurement of PCC or a specific subcomponent, 2) a focus on the use of or validation of an instrument, and 3) the instrument is answered by healthcare staff or students. Results: The search yielded 1612 records, with 147 studies meeting the inclusion criteria after the first review round describing 141 instruments. Studies were carried out across the globe; 41 countries were identified. The majority of the studies were conducted in Europe (44%). By country, the highest number of studies were conducted in the USA (21), Australia (12), and Sweden (10). The most commonly occurring instruments with a frequency of four or more in the included studies were ICS-Nurse (4), PDC (4), ICI (5), RIAS (5), PCPI-S (8), PCQ-S (12), PPOS (12), and P-CAT (26). None of the instruments fully followed the internationally recognized framework for PCC best practice. In addition, most studies implementing the instruments were one-off research projects with limited generalizability of the findings. Conclusions: Many instruments are available for evaluating PCC from a staff perspective. However, these instruments have not been integrated into routine healthcare quality assessment. To inform the implementation of PCC, future studies should examine instruments' psychometric properties and ways to implement them effectively in different contexts.